FREE PREVIEW
|
LOGIN OR SUBSCRIBE NOW TO READ THIS ARTICLE
|
Greenapple v. Capital One
|
Tuesday, February 21, 2012
|
|
The New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, held that prospective purchaser sufficiently alleged a cause of action against escrow agent for breach of fiduciary duty, overturning the lower courts granting of the escrow agent’s motion to dismiss, and returning the case to trial. The court said the defendant had failed to “utterly refute the allegations” in the plaintiffs’ complaint.
TO READ THE FULL STORY
|

|
Already a subscriber?
Problems logging in?
Please call 330-659-6101 x 805 or email us for assistance.
|
|