The Legal Description

 FREE PREVIEW
LOGIN OR SUBSCRIBE NOW TO READ THIS ARTICLE
US vs. Deer
Friday, September 09, 2011
A federal court awarded restitution to two underwriters and a closing agent, as well as several lending institutions, in a fraud case, refusing to buy the perpetrator’s argument that the value of the security should offset restitution where one of the underwriters had suffered nearly a million dollar loss in claims based on the fraud.

 



You've requested access to Premium content that is only available to paid subscribers of The Legal Description.

Subscribe today to read the full version of this story and get full access to The Legal Description's comprehensive coverage of the regulations and legislation shaping the title insurance industry.

 

Choose from the following subscription options:

Already a subscriber?

User Name:
Password:

     

Order Now

Order Now

Order Now

Order Now


Most Popular
Today's Top Stories


Take our current Poll
Would it be a good idea to have a third-party company vet title agents?






 
Upcoming Webinar

Reviewing your Marketing
Agreements and the
Interpretive Rule
Part 3 of the 2013 RESPA Webinar Series
In this 60-minute webinar, two RESPA attorneys will educate participants on effective marketing agreements that comply with the current regulatory landscape.
PUBLICATIONS  |  WEBINARS  |  SPECIAL REPORTS