Join us on LinkedIn Follow us on Twitter Like us on Facebook Follow us on Instagram
 
  OCTOBER RESEARCH STORE SUBSCRIBE LOG IN
AddControlToContainer_DynamicNavigation3
The Legal Description > News > North Carolina adopts conveyance, notary amendments

North Carolina adopts conveyance, notary amendments

Email A Friend Printer Friendly Version
0 comments
Legislative Developments
Monday, August 23, 2021

The North Carolina Legislature has adopted legislation that amends, among other things, the state’s notary and conveyance statutes.

North Carolina SB 196 amends G.S. 93A-12 to read, “An escrow agent may deposit with the clerk of court in accordance with this section monies, other than a residential security deposit, the ownership of which are in dispute and that were received while the escrow agent was acting in a fiduciary capacity.”

When depositing the disputed funds, the escrow agent must certify to the clerk of court that the persons claiming ownership of the disputed funds have been notified that the disputed funds are to be deposited with the clerk of court and that the persons may initiate a special proceeding with the clerk of court to recover the disputed funds.

Escrow agents must not deposit disputed funds with the clerk of courts until 90 days after notifying the person claiming ownership of the disputed funds.

The new law defines escrow agent as:

  • Areal estate broker licensed under this chapter
  • An attorney licensed to practice law in this state
  • A title insurance company or title insurance agent licensed to conduct business in this state.

It amends G.S. 41-56 to state that unless a contrary intention is expressed in the conveyance, a conveyance of real property, or any interest in real property, to two spouses vests title in them as tenants by the entirety.

A conveyance by a grantor of real property, or any interest in real property, to the grantor and his or her spouse vests the property in them as tenants by the entirety, unless a contrary intention is expressed in the conveyance.

“When spouses become co-owners of a mobile home, in the absence of a contrary intention appearing in the instrument of title, the spouses become tenants by the entirety with all the incidents of an estate by the entirety in real property, including the right of survivorship in the case of death of either spouse,” the bill continues. “For the purposes of this subsection, it is immaterial whether the property at any particular time is classified for any purpose as either real or personal. Nothing in this subsection is deemed to limit or prohibit any other type of ownership otherwise authorized by law. For the purposes of this subsection, the term ‘mobile home’ means a portable manufactured housing unit designed for transportation on its own chassis and placement on temporary or semipermanent foundation having a measurement of over 32 feet in length and over eight feet in width. As used this subsection, the term ‘mobile home’ also means a double-wide mobile home consisting of two or more portable manufactured housing units that are designed for transportation on their own chassis and are connected on site for placement on a temporary or semipermanent foundation having a measurement of over 32 feet in length and over eight feet in width.”

It amends G.S. 47-18 to state, “No conveyance of land, contract to convey, option to purchase or convey, lease of land for more than three years, right of  first refusal, or right of first offer is valid to pass any property interest as against lien creditors or purchasers for a valuable consideration from the donor, bargainor, or lessor but from the time of its registration in the county where the land lies, or if the land is located in more than one county, then in each county where any portion of the land lies to be effective as to the land in that county. Unless otherwise stated either on the registered instrument or on a separate registered instrument duly executed by the party whose priority interest is adversely affected, instruments registered in the office of the register of deeds have priority based on the order of registration as determined by the time of registration, and if instruments are registered simultaneously, then the instruments are presumed to have priority determined as follows:

  • The earliest document number set forth on the registered instrument.
  • The sequential book and page number set forth on the registered instrument if no document number is set forth on the registered instrument.

The law also states that, among other things, all notary acknowledgments performed before July 1, 2013, bearing a notarial seal are validated.

It also notes that a notarial certificate contained in a form issued by a state agency prior to April 1, 2021, is deemed to be a valid certificate so long as the certificate complied with the law at the time the form was used.

It amends G.S. 10B-71 to read, “Any acknowledgment taken and any instrument notarized by a person who after recommissioning failed to again take the oath as a notary public is hereby validated. The acknowledgment and instrument have the same legal effect as if the person qualified as a notary public at the time the person performed the act. This section applies to notarial acts performed on or after May 15, 2004, and before April 1, 2021.”

It amends G.S. 47-48 to state, “When it appears that the clerk of the superior court, register of deeds, or other officer having the power to probate or certify deeds, in passing upon deeds or other instruments, and related certificates, consisting of more than one certificate of the same or a different date by other officer or officers taking acknowledgment or probating the certificates, has in his or her certificate or order mentioned only one or more of the preceding or foregoing certificates or orders, but not all of them, but has admitted the same deed or other instrument to probate or recordation, it is conclusively presumed that all the certificates of the deed or instrument necessary for probate or recordation have been passed upon, and the certificate of the clerk, register of deeds, or other probating or certifying officer is deemed sufficient and the probate, certification, and recordation of the deed or instrument is valid for all intents and purposes. This section applies to all instruments recorded in any county of this state prior to April 1, 2021.”

It further amends G.S. 47-53 to state, “If the acknowledgment, private examination, or other proof of the execution of any deed, mortgage, or other instrument authorized or required to be registered has been taken by or before any commissioner of affidavits and deeds of this state, clerk or deputy clerk of a court of record, or notary public of this or any other state, territory, or district, and the deed, mortgage, or other instrument has been recorded in any county in this state, but the commissioner, clerk, deputy clerk, or notary public omitted to attach his or her official or notarial seal to it, or if omitted, to insert his or her name in the body of the certificate, or if omitted, to sign his or her name to the certificate, if the name of the officer appears in the body of the certificate or is signed to it, or it does not appear of record that the seal was attached to the original deed, mortgage, or other instrument, or the commissioner, clerk, deputy clerk, or notary public has certified the certificate as under his or her ‘official seal,’ or ‘notarial seal,’ or words of similar import, and no such seal appears of record or where the officer uses ‘notarial’ in his or her certificate and signatures shows that C.S.C., or clerk of superior court, or similar exchange of capacity, and the word seal follows the signature, then all such acknowledgments, private examinations or other proofs of such deeds, mortgages, or other instruments, and their registration are in all respects valid and binding. This section applies to acknowledgments, private examinations, or proofs taken prior to April 1, 2021. This section does not apply to pending litigation.”

Today's other top stories
‘MV Realty Bill’ goes to Wisconsin governor’s desk
Fannie, Freddie rebrand fintech joint venture
Union responds to HUD plans to relocate to NSF headquarters
Texas enacts new licensing, contract regulations for real estate agents
Jay Jones claims victory in Virginia AG primary race


COMMENT BOX DISCLAIMER:
October Research is not responsible for the comments posted on its websites by readers. We will do our best to remove comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments.
Comments:

Be the first to leave a comment.

Leave your comment
Please enter a comment.
CAPTCHA Validation
CAPTCHA
Code:
Please enter the word displayed in the image above. Please enter the word displayed in the image above.
: 
Please enter your name.
: 
Please enter your email address.
This field must contain a valid email address.
Your Email is for reporting purposes only. It will NOT be displayed.
Popularity:
This article has been viewed 1610 times.
News by Topic   News by Edition   In-depth Reports   Events   Subscribe
Court Report
Cybersecurity
Excess Equity
Industry News
Legislative Developments
Regulatory Updates
Remote Online Notarization
The Blotter
The TRID Journey
 
May 26, 2025
June 9, 2025
June 23, 2025
July 7, 2025
Archives
 
2025 State of the Industry
Cybersecurity Today
Technology as a Compliance Tool
Real Estate Compliance Outlook
Title Insurance Alternatives
eClosing Security
Attorney State Perspectives
Technology as a Compliance Tool
Archives
 
 
National Settlement Services Summit (NS3)
Women's Leadership Summit (WLS)
Webinars
 
Newsletter Subscriptions
Free Email Updates
Try a Free Edition
  About   Library   Other Publications  
 
The Legal Description
Contact / Editors
Advertise
Request a Media Kit
Social Media
Are You An Expert?
Subscriber Agreement
 
Blog - Tuesdays with Mary
Cybersecurity Central
Court Cases
Keys to Real Estate Podcast
Legislation
Position Papers
Regulations
RON Resource Center
 
The Title Report
RESPA News
Valuation Review
Dodd Frank Upate
 
                 
Copyright © 2000-2025 The Legal Description
An October Research, LLC publication
3046 Brecksville Road, Suite D, Richfield, OH 44286
(330) 659-6101, All Rights Reserved
www.thelegaldescription.com | Privacy Policy
VISIT OUR OTHER WEBSITES
> The Title Report
> RESPA News
> Dodd Frank Update
> Valuation Review
> NS3 The Summit
> Women's Leadership Summit
> October Research, LLC
> The October Store


Loading... Loading...
Featuring:
  • Delivery 3X a week plus breaking news as it happens
  • Comprehensive title insurance industry news
  • Recent acquisitions, mergers, real estate stats
  • Exclusive in-depth coverage of the industry's hottest stories
Featuring:
  • Delivery 2X a week plus breaking news as it happens
  • Comprehensive Dodd-Frank coverage
  • The latest information from the CFPB
  • Full coverage of Congressional hearings
  • Updates on all agency actions
  • Analysis of controversial provisions
  • Release of newest studies and reports
Sign up today and...
  • Be one of the first to know where NS3 is being held
  • Learn about NS3 speakers and sessions
  • Save on registration with Super-Early Bird rates
  • Discover the networking opportunities NS3 offers
  • Find out if CE credits will be offered for your area
  • And much more
Featuring:
  • Delivery 2X a week plus breaking news as it happens
  • Preview the latest RESPAnews.com Top Story
  • RESPA related headline news
  • Quote of the Week
Featuring:
  • Delivery 2X a week plus breaking news as it happens
  • Legal, regulatory and legislative information impacting the settlement services industry
  • News from HUD, Congress, state legislatures and other regulatory agencies
  • Follow the lobbying efforts of all the major national real estate services organizations.
Featuring:
  • Delivery 2X a week plus breaking news as it happens
  • The industry's only full-time newsroom
  • Relevant, up-to-date appraisal industry news
  • Covering the hottest stories and industry trends
NEWS BY TOPIC
NEWS BY EDITION
IN-DEPTH REPORTS
EVENTS
LIBRARY
FREE EMAIL UPDATES
ABOUT
SUBSCRIBE
Court Report
Cybersecurity
Excess Equity
Industry News
Legislative Developments
Regulatory Updates
Remote Online Notarization
State AG Enforcement
The Blotter
Current Edition
June 9, 2025
May 26, 2025
May 12, 2025
April 28, 2025
Archives
2025 Voice of the Title Agent
2025 State of the Industry
Cybersecurity Today
2024 Title Technology
eClosing Innovations
Real Estate Compliance Outlook
Title Insurance Alternatives
Archives
National Settlement
Services Summit (NS3)
Women's Leadership
Summit (WLS)
Webinars
2025 Economic Outlook Series
Evolving Realtor Relationships
CFPB's Shake-Up & Its Impact
Artificial Intelligence for Title
Industry and Regulatory Outlook
RESPA Updates You Need to Know
Strategies post-NAR settlement
Evolving Consumer Relationships
Fraud Threats Facing Title
Excess Equity
2024 Economic Forecast Series
Securing Your Cyber Network
Webinar Archives
State AG Enforcement
Keys to Real Estate Podcast
Blog - Tuesdays with Mary
Excess Equity Watch
Cyber Solutions Showcase
Cybersecurity Central
eClosing Solutions Showcase
Executive Interview Series
RON Resource Center
Case Law
Legislation
Position Papers
Regulations
By Year
By State
2012
2011
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Comment Letters
White Papers
Testimony
The Legal Description
Contact Us
Advertise
Request a Media Kit
Are You An Expert?
Subscriber Agreement
Social Media