Join us on LinkedIn Follow us on Twitter Like us on Facebook Follow us on Instagram
 
  OCTOBER RESEARCH STORE SUBSCRIBE LOG IN
AddControlToContainer_DynamicNavigation3
The Legal Description > News > Industry reacts to CFPB’s RFI on settlement services costs

Industry reacts to CFPB’s RFI on settlement services costs

Email A Friend Printer Friendly Version
0 comments
Regulatory Updates
Monday, June 3, 2024

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) issued a request for information (RFI) on mortgage closing costs, seeking input on how closing costs “may be inflated and constraining” the mortgage lending market.

“The CFPB wants to understand why closing costs are increasing, who is benefiting, and how costs for borrowers and lenders could be lowered,” the bureau stated in its release. “According to a CFPB analysis, the closing costs borrowers pay in connection with a mortgage have risen steeply in recent years. From 2021 to 2023, median total loan costs for home mortgages increased by over 36 percent. The unavoidable fees borrowers must pay at closing can strain household budgets and families’ ability to afford a down payment. The fees may also limit the ability of lenders to offer competitive mortgages because they have to absorb the higher costs or pass them on to borrowers.”

Examples of closing costs that impact lenders’ cost per loan were items such as credit scores, credit reports, and employment verification. The CFPB asserted that dominant market players have driven up the costs of these and other products through annual price increases that have significantly outpaced inflation, forcing lenders to pay these higher rates. These increases are then passed on to the consumer or eat into a lender’s bottom line in an already tight market.

“If the RFI is a window into the CFPB’s thinking, specifically that bundling of fees is better, this is inapposite of the rational for TRID,” said Francis X. Riley III, co-chair of the Consumer Financial Services Litigation Group, Saul Ewing LLP. “The cost to the lending and title industries to reformat their documents and related software to address a required bundling will be immense. The cost of a one-time lender’s title policy, when purchased with an owner’s policy, has not substantially increased because of anything other than the price of homes increasing.  Moreover, in many states the fee is established by a rating bureau or state regulations. So, for the CFPB to get itself all in a bunch about the associated fee is disingenuous. 

“This notwithstanding, if a homebuyer wants a lender to extend it substantial financing which might be at risk during the time the borrower owns the home or in the unfortunate circumstance when the borrower has defaulted, why shouldn’t the lender be able to require its borrower to provide protection for the only asset that secures repayment of the loan; especially protection that has no time or other limitations, e.g., SOL like those associated with the recently proffered attorney-opinion letter? That answer is ‘it shouldn’t be.’ If the CFPB wants to see an industry contract, which will have significant detrimental impact on borrowers across all spectrums, impose a rule that prohibits this fee being born by the borrowers.”

“My initial reaction is that while it does address title insurance as one of the borrower costs being scrutinized by the RFI, the request is not as damning of the cost of lender's policies as feared,” said Charles Cain, SVP-National Agency Division, FNF Family of Companies. If the goal is bundling of costs that may be paid by the lender instead of the borrower, it would seem that would be a retreat from the greater transparency of costs desired by the bureau elsewhere.”

“It appears that the CFPB is looking to support an argument that mortgage closing costs, and it specifically calls out title insurance and credit reporting, are not subject to competition and so they’re a potential UDAAP violation,” Garris Horn LLP Managing Partner Richard Horn, formerly CFPB senior counsel, told RESPA News, a The Legal Description sister publication, in an email. “This RFI appears to also be attempting to set up a record that disclosure as a tool, especially as a means to enable shopping, is insufficient to protect consumers from these closing costs. 

“Once the idea that disclosure is insufficient is solidified at the CFPB, it can be a problem with respect to other areas of the mortgage market, and for other products, as well,” he added. “Disclosure is the consumer protection tool that is the least disruptive to the marketplace and allows for consumer choice. The industry will need to comment on this RFI.”

Marx Sterbcow, managing attorney for the Sterbcow Law Group, said this RFI officially sets the stage for a “looming” RESPA reform rule.

“They are seeking to force lenders to bundle these legitimate charges into the cost of the borrower’s mortgage loan,” Sterbcow said. “In the end borrowers will have less transparency on why their mortgage rates have increased and higher borrower costs as creditors will just absorb these costs by increasing their mortgage rates.   The CFPB is of the mindset that it’s not what you do – it’s what you get the public to think you do in this illusion of lower borrower costs in the residential mortgage market.”

Comments are due to the CFPB by Aug. 2. Specifically, the CFPB is seeking answers to the following questions:

  • Are there particular fees that are concerning or cause hardships for consumers?
  • Are there any fees charged that are not or should not be necessary to close the loan?
  • Provide data or evidence on the degree to which consumers compare closing costs across lenders.
  • Provide data or evidence on the degree to which consumers shop for closing costs across settlement providers.
  • How are fees currently set? Who profits from the various fees? Who benefits from the service provided? What leverage or oversight do lenders have over third-party costs that are passed onto the consumer?
  • Which closing costs have increased the most over the past several years? What is the cause of such increases? Do they differ for purchase or refinance? Please provide data to support if possible.
  • What is driving the recent price increases of credit reports and credit scores? How are different parts of the credit report chain (credit score provider, national credit reporting agencies, reseller) contributing to this increase in costs? What competitive forces are or can be brought to bear on these costs? What are the impacts on consumers of the increased costs?
  • Would lenders be more effective at negotiating closing costs than consumers? Are there reports or evidence that are relevant to the topic?
  • What studies or data are available to measure the potential impact closing costs may have on overall costs, housing affordability, access to homeownership, or home equity?

Industry associations were quick to react to the RFI.

In a statement, the American Land Title Association (ALTA) said it looked forward to participating in the RFI and getting the opportunity to educate federal agencies on how the title insurance market works. It further noted that the services provided by title professionals are essential, and the costs for title insurance coverage has decreased 5 percent in the last five years.

“Importantly, fees for title insurance and other closing costs must be provided and disclosed to consumers under a federally mandated rule that the CFPB itself developed in 2015,” the association stated. “Lumping title insurance and settlement services into the category of ‘junk fees’ conflicts with the White House’s own definition, which cites the lack of disclosure of the fee being charged. CFPB’s own research from as recently as 2020 shows these disclosures are working to educate consumers about closing costs. The CFPB report praised its own rule for improving ‘consumers’ ability to locate key information, compare terms and costs between initial disclosures and final disclosures, and compare terms and costs across mortgage offers.’

“Our products are comprehensively regulated at the state level by departments of insurance, and title insurance companies are required to file their policies and rates with state regulators to ensure they are fair, non-discriminatory, and adequately protect consumers – with rates justified using actuarially supported data,” ALTA continued. “The title industry does more than just issue an insurance policy, performing vital work to cure defects in the chain of title, including unpaid taxes, child support and other liens, as well as combating fraud schemes like wire and deed fraud to protect consumers.”

A joint statement was issued by the American Bankers Association, Housing Policy Council, and Mortgage Bankers Association in reaction to the RFI: “Given the significant home-price appreciation and swift inflation that consumers have encountered in recent years, a discussion about policies that address affordability burdens while maintaining healthy and competitive mortgage markets makes good sense.

“Mortgage lenders fully and transparently disclose costs to every borrower on forms developed and prescribed by Congress in the Dodd-Frank Act and implemented by the CFPB,” they continued. “Many of those disclosed costs, such as title, appraisal and credit reports are required by federal statutes, safety and soundness guidelines, and the Federal Housing Administration, Department of Veterans Affairs, and Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac as a condition of buying and insuring a mortgage. Moreover, the services these fees cover mitigate risk for taxpayers and borrowers alike.

“The CFPB recently concluded a formal review and evaluation of its mortgage disclosure rules and praised them for improving borrower understanding and facilitating the ability to shop among lenders. The industry invested considerable resources to implement these new rules just a decade ago. If the CFPB is now modifying its previous position and is considering changing this complex regulatory disclosure regime, a rule-making process governed by the Administrative Procedure Act – and supported by a robust cost-benefit analysis – is the only appropriate vehicle to initiate that work. Such a rule-making process would allow for the proper level of engagement to produce changes that benefit consumers and do not add compliance costs and lead to negative unintended consequences.”

Today's other top stories
Appeals court hears dispute between mortgage assigner, insurer
Insurance Data Protection Act introduced to Senate
Trump administration proposes cutting $491 million from CISA budget
FHFA director accuses NY AG of mortgage fraud
Colorado passes bill to create title insurance industry advisory group


COMMENT BOX DISCLAIMER:
October Research is not responsible for the comments posted on its websites by readers. We will do our best to remove comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments.
Comments:

Be the first to leave a comment.

Leave your comment
Please enter a comment.
CAPTCHA Validation
CAPTCHA
Code:
Please enter the word displayed in the image above. Please enter the word displayed in the image above.
: 
Please enter your name.
: 
Please enter your email address.
This field must contain a valid email address.
Your Email is for reporting purposes only. It will NOT be displayed.
Popularity:
This article has been viewed 929 times.
News by Topic   News by Edition   In-depth Reports   Events   Subscribe
Court Report
Cybersecurity
Excess Equity
Industry News
Legislative Developments
Regulatory Updates
Remote Online Notarization
The Blotter
The TRID Journey
 
March 31, 2025
April 14, 2025
April 28, 2025
May 26, 2025
Archives
 
2025 State of the Industry
Cybersecurity Today
Technology as a Compliance Tool
Real Estate Compliance Outlook
Title Insurance Alternatives
eClosing Security
Attorney State Perspectives
Technology as a Compliance Tool
Archives
 
 
National Settlement Services Summit (NS3)
Women's Leadership Summit (WLS)
Webinars
 
Newsletter Subscriptions
Free Email Updates
Try a Free Edition
  About   Library   Other Publications  
 
The Legal Description
Contact / Editors
Advertise
Request a Media Kit
Social Media
Are You An Expert?
Subscriber Agreement
 
Blog - Tuesdays with Mary
Cybersecurity Central
Court Cases
Keys to Real Estate Podcast
Legislation
Position Papers
Regulations
RON Resource Center
 
The Title Report
RESPA News
Valuation Review
Dodd Frank Upate
 
                 
Copyright © 2000-2025 The Legal Description
An October Research, LLC publication
3046 Brecksville Road, Suite D, Richfield, OH 44286
(330) 659-6101, All Rights Reserved
www.thelegaldescription.com | Privacy Policy
VISIT OUR OTHER WEBSITES
> The Title Report
> RESPA News
> Dodd Frank Update
> Valuation Review
> NS3 The Summit
> Women's Leadership Summit
> October Research, LLC
> The October Store


Loading... Loading...
Featuring:
  • Delivery 3X a week plus breaking news as it happens
  • Comprehensive title insurance industry news
  • Recent acquisitions, mergers, real estate stats
  • Exclusive in-depth coverage of the industry's hottest stories
Featuring:
  • Delivery 2X a week plus breaking news as it happens
  • Comprehensive Dodd-Frank coverage
  • The latest information from the CFPB
  • Full coverage of Congressional hearings
  • Updates on all agency actions
  • Analysis of controversial provisions
  • Release of newest studies and reports
Sign up today and...
  • Be one of the first to know where NS3 is being held
  • Learn about NS3 speakers and sessions
  • Save on registration with Super-Early Bird rates
  • Discover the networking opportunities NS3 offers
  • Find out if CE credits will be offered for your area
  • And much more
Featuring:
  • Delivery 2X a week plus breaking news as it happens
  • Preview the latest RESPAnews.com Top Story
  • RESPA related headline news
  • Quote of the Week
Featuring:
  • Delivery 2X a week plus breaking news as it happens
  • Legal, regulatory and legislative information impacting the settlement services industry
  • News from HUD, Congress, state legislatures and other regulatory agencies
  • Follow the lobbying efforts of all the major national real estate services organizations.
Featuring:
  • Delivery 2X a week plus breaking news as it happens
  • The industry's only full-time newsroom
  • Relevant, up-to-date appraisal industry news
  • Covering the hottest stories and industry trends
NEWS BY TOPIC
NEWS BY EDITION
IN-DEPTH REPORTS
EVENTS
LIBRARY
FREE EMAIL UPDATES
ABOUT
SUBSCRIBE
Court Report
Cybersecurity
Excess Equity
Industry News
Legislative Developments
Regulatory Updates
Remote Online Notarization
State AG Enforcement
The Blotter
Current Edition
April 14, 2025
March 31, 2025
March 17, 2025
March 3, 2025
Archives
2025 Voice of the Title Agent
2025 State of the Industry
Cybersecurity Today
2024 Title Technology
eClosing Innovations
Real Estate Compliance Outlook
Title Insurance Alternatives
Archives
National Settlement
Services Summit (NS3)
Women's Leadership
Summit (WLS)
Webinars
Evolving Realtor Relationships
2025 Economic Outlook Series
CFPB's Shake-Up & Its Impact
Artificial Intelligence for Title
Industry and Regulatory Outlook
RESPA Updates You Need to Know
Strategies post-NAR settlement
Evolving Consumer Relationships
Fraud Threats Facing Title
Excess Equity
2024 Economic Forecast Series
Securing Your Cyber Network
Webinar Archives
Cyber Solutions Showcase
Keys to Real Estate Podcast
Blog - Tuesdays with Mary
Excess Equity Watch
Cybersecurity Central
eClosing Solutions Showcase
Executive Interview Series
RON Resource Center
Case Law
Legislation
Position Papers
Regulations
By Year
By State
2012
2011
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Comment Letters
White Papers
Testimony
The Legal Description
Contact Us
Advertise
Request a Media Kit
Are You An Expert?
Subscriber Agreement
Social Media