San Diego City Attorney Mara Elliott and San Francisco City Attorney David Chiu subpoenaed Home Title Lock, seeking information about the company’s allegedly deceptive advertising to convince homeowners to purchase unnecessary home title monitoring services.
The announcement stated the company’s TV, radio, and online advertisements incite fear about a nationwide trend of so-called “home title theft,” claiming scammers can easily steal a home or its equity by recording a fraudulent title document and that the prevalence of this crime is rising rapidly. However, a fraudulent deed has no legal effect in California and therefore cannot result in loss of a home or its equity.
The company’s alarmist statements about the prevalence of fraudulently recorded deeds are undermined by the sources the company cites, according to the subpoena. After stoking fear of home title theft, Home Title Lock suggests its service will safeguard a consumer’s home title. In actuality, the service does not and cannot do anything of the sort. Instead, it merely notifies homeowners after a fraudulent deed has been recorded.
Home Title Lock is a California-based company that utilizes deceptive advertising to sell its subscription home title monitoring service, according to the subpoena. It advertises aggressively across the United States and in California, targeting elderly consumers. The company partners with conservative spokespeople including Rudy Giuliani, Sean Hannity, Newt Gingrich, Ben Shapiro, Bill O’Reilly, Glenn Beck and Dana Loesch to advertise and endorse its services.
Home Title Lock routinely makes untrue and misleading claims in advertisements, the subpoena states, including that home title theft is a widespread problem constituting a “nationwide crime wave” recognized by the FBI. It falsely claims that it is easy to fraudulently transfer a home title and that title fraud results in a loss of title or home equity. The ads then mislead the consumer by claiming that Home Title Lock’s service “locks” or protects a home title from fraudulent transfers.
In reality, title theft is impossible at least in California, where a fraudulently recorded title is void. Meanwhile, fraudulent recording of titles is rare and likely to be quickly discovered. The FBI does not collect data on home title fraud, nor has it issued a public warning about it. Even if home title fraud were a widespread problem, Home Title Lock’s service does not “lock” or secure a home title. The company merely provides notifications to consumers after a new document is recorded, which is a service that many county recorders’ offices provide for free.
In some advertisements, alleged victims and perpetrators of home title theft have described their experiences. Only later, media outlets discovered that one of the alleged “victims” depicted had voluntarily sold her home and no such fraud occurred. Home Title Lock’s deceptive ads appear to violate multiple California laws, including California’s Unfair Competition Law, which authorizes courts to halt misleading advertising, provide refunds to consumers, and order civil penalties of $2,500 per violation generally and $5,000 per violation against elderly or disabled consumers. The subpoena seeks information about the impact of the company’s deceptive ads on Californians.
The subpoena reflects an early use of city attorneys’ authority under Assembly Bill 2766, effective since January 2023, to issue pre-litigation subpoenas to investigate potential violations of the Unfair Competition Law.